Archive for May 20, 2008

Evergrey, Eyefear & Transcending Mortality

Fast, Melodic & Full of Power

It was at a relatively small bar in Sydney’s centre where Evergrey were set to play their first ever show in Australia. While normally the more popular metal acts that visit Australia opt for larger, more spacious venues when touring, The Gaelic Theatre was ideal for the relatively unknown progressive metal quintet – atmospheric yet very personal. It was almost as if the band was playing for one large family out to celebrate their passion for the heavier sounds of the music sphere.

First up on the night were local act Transcending Mortality. I wasn’t particularly enthused when learning the band was to kick-start the show, particularly when the last time I saw them I left feeling as if I had lost my entire auditory sense – perhaps not their direct fault but still a part of it. Needless to say the group wasted no time entering into one of their heavier tracks titled Beyond Remembrance from their album The Lost Horizon. I was blown away. Instantly my previous thoughts on the group seemed unfairly prejudicial. The band progressed through their intensive mix of power metal via the unique sounds of guitarists Shane Linfoot and Jonathan Talan, drummer Matt Shriffer and (perhaps more so) vocalist Mike Zoias, pausing between songs to thank their loyal audience. Overall, a great set and enthusiastic performance was perfect as the start of the power metal evening.

Next up was Eyefear – one of Melbourne’s most loved power metal bands. With a new album out titled ‘A World Full of Grey’ (which has been critically acclaimed by many Australian reviewers) the band began most appropriately with a couple of new songs. Though the music provided by the band was just excellent, there was one thing that captured my full attention throughout the entire set – vocalist Danny Cecati. Using a vocal style made popular by metal groups such as Symphony X, Iron Maiden and King Diamond, Cecati was just brilliant in his vocal delivery providing a falsetto-like tone that surpassed every vocalist that night (and perhaps even some of his more famous influences). While Cecati provided a voice enough to make your hair stand on end, keyboardist Sammy Giaccotto was brilliant during his solo on ‘Searching for Forgiveness’ and the rest of the band excellent in their power metal consistency. Overall the group provided a one-hour set that was both musically and visually entertaining (due to Cecati’s extremely long hair!) proving to be an excellent group of musicians with huge future prospects.

A few minutes later and Evergrey appeared onstage dressed in jet black leather pants, black t-shirts and a handful of silver chains and accessories. Saluting the crowd with the iconic ‘devil-horn’ gesture the band looked ready to provide a full-on power metal assault. Starting with the Evergrey classic Blinded, the group provided a powerfully electric performance that drew an incredibly enthusiastic response from the crowd. As the song ended, the band stood back looking somewhat puzzled as lead singer Tom Englund walked up to the microphone and said just one thing – “wow”. Clearly astonished at the reaction and admiration provided by the Australian fans the band payed their respects by playing fan favourites Nosferatu, A Touch of Blessing and Solitude Within as well as treating the audience to a keyboard solo, guitar solo, drum solo, and two encores.

As the band progressed through new songs off album ‘Monday Morning Apocalypse’ the energy intensified and the band appeared to be putting all their might into the show. Then, as Evergrey appeared to be leaving, drummer Jonas Ekdahl remained onstage while an intense white light covered his drum kit. Starting with some subtle cymbal work he progressively ascended his pace to show off his unique power metal style. As his solo drew over 5 minutes he was joined by guitarist Henrik Danhage and keyboardist Rikard Zander. Suddenly the drumming was silenced by the unique and mysterious sound of Zander’s keyboard’s that was again overlapped by Danhage’s guitar work. Then it turned competitive. As one showed off on their instrument, the other responded with something louder, faster and heavier. While the competitiveness grew the drums came in, the band returned onstage and the theatre erupted into A Touch of Blessing. What came next was quite unusual. An obviously huge Evergrey fan walked onto the stage and started mimicking the guitarist’s movements. While the band (and the crowd) found him to be hilarious, Danhage decided to give the fan his guitar as an “opportunity to show of his Evergrey skills”. It was great to see the band’s good humour – any other famous band might have easily kicked him off the stage. Unfortunately as any good night at a metal gig the time had come for their final song of the night. As it finished each of the band members stood together in a neat line, linked hands and, in one theatrical movement, bowed together in appreciation of their “phenomenal audience”. Having been captivated by their legion of Aussie fans, Englund stepped up to the microphone – “my friends, after the show you all deserve a beer, thank you so much!”. And they weren’t kidding, when the show ended an announcement was made that Evergrey would come back out into the hall for an autograph session, to pose for photos and (for those who lingered around until 2am) have some beers.

Overall, though the setting was very simplistic and the stage relatively small, Evergrey, Eyefear and Transcending Mortality transformed the theatre into an arena. Australian fans were treated to an absolute blast of power metal provided by musicians who were obviously passionate and loyal to their profession.

Lilen Pautasso

Words: 900

‘Experimental Music’ By John Cage – A Response

‘Experimental Music’ By John Cage – A Response

This post is a response to John Cage’s speech he gave at the 1957 Music Teachers National Association in Chicago.

The first thing I noted was that this speech was given in 1957 which gives more of an idea about the history of experimental music – its over 50 years old, and possibly older.

 

“Many people, of course, have given up saying “experimental” about this new music. Instead, they move on to a halfway point and say “controversial” or depart to a greater distance and question whether this “music” is music at all.” (1957: 1)

I believe this statement is still the case with experimental music today, 50 years on. Many people see experimental music as controversial or not as music at all because in some cases it strays so far from what most people understand as ‘music’. Experimental music is still seen as new, even though it has its own legitimate history, notated by people such as John Cage.

I believe that because experimental music pushes the boundaries of what is seen as ‘music’, many people disregard it.

This style of music could be seen as confronting to many because of its stray from the norms of popular music. Many people have never encountered anything like this style of music before, and because they aren’t accustomed to the sound and many don’t take the time to try and appreciate what the music has to offer, it gets discounted.

 

Cage states that in relation to experimental music, “in this new music, nothing takes place but sounds: those that are notated and those that are not.” (1957:1)

This emphasises the importance of sounds in experimental music – they are the basis for creating music within the experimental genre.

Experimental music revolves around the production and the combination of sounds. ”In musical terms, any sounds may occur in any combination and in any continuity.” (1957:2) This differs greatly from most popular styles of music. Experimental music is primarily concerned with the experimentation of sound. The final product and its success in terms of money and fame isn’t the principal motivation, as is the case in many popular music styles. The journey throughout creating the piece of music and the exploration and production of sound is the key motivation.

I believe this statement encapsulates the purpose of experimental music perfectly. “New music: new listening. Not an attempt to understand something that is being said, for if something were being said, the sounds would be given the shapes of words. Just an attention to the activity of sounds.” (1957: 3-4)

This quote demonstrates the importance of experimentation and sounds in experimental music.

 

Cage also talks about tracks and “multiple track tapes and machines.” (1957: 4) This emphasises the importance of layers within experimental music. Multiple tracks are needed in order to layer multiple sounds over one another, thus creating the style of music known as experimental music.

 

Cage draws attention to what I believe is one of the most interesting and important aspects to experimental music. “Each performance of such a piece of music is unique, as interesting to its composer as to others listening… no two are exactly alike.” (1957:4)

I believe this unique characteristic and the difference in performance to performance is something that makes experimental music valuable to music itself – it is a fluid and diverse genre that challenges peoples conceptions of music and is in a state of constant creation and experimentation.

 

“This music is not concerned with harmoniousness, as generally understood, where the quality of harmony results from a blending of several elements. Here we are concerned with the coexistence of dissimilars, and the central points where fusion occurs are many: the ears of the listeners whatever they are.” (1957:5)

This statement alludes to one of the main reasons I believe experimental music isn’t as popular as other genres. It often has clashing sounds and is jarring to hear, because of the experimentation and combination with sounds. But as Cage states, when fusion occurs, and a perfect sound or combination of sounds is produced, the experimentation is by far worth it.

Cage also emphasises the importance of the listener and their context in experimental music. The listener is so important to experimental music because they interpret it how they want to. There generally aren’t lyrics telling them what the song is about, thus it gives the listener more of an opportunity to create their own understanding and attach their own meaning to a song.

 

To conclude my response, early on in the speech, Cage states that “one need not fear about the future of music.” (1957:2)

I am in two minds in relation to this statement. I agree that with experimental music being present in the world of music and this style of music constantly pushing the boundaries of new music, the future of music is bright.

However, I believe the future of experimental music itself is questionable, if many continue to disregard it and it is forgotten from the history of music.

 

Word Count: 839

References:

Cage, John. 1957, Experimental Music. http://grace.evergreen.edu/~arunc/texts/music/cage1/cage1.pdf